-
A great example of a terrible UX (#Barclays)
Every three months my accountant asks me to send them my bank statements to do the company’s VAT returns. It’s annoying but hey, no one can access my bank account except me. But then something happened recently. The company’s bank accounts are with Barclays, and they changed the interface or did something so that, when……
-
A great example of a terrible UX (#Barclays)
Every three months my accountant asks me to send them my bank statements to do the company’s VAT returns. It’s annoying but hey, no one can access my bank account except me. But then something happened recently. The company’s bank accounts are with Barclays, and they changed the interface or did something so that, when……
-
A great example of a terrible UX (#Barclays)
Every three months my accountant asks me to send them my bank statements to do the company’s VAT returns. It’s annoying but hey, no one can access my bank account except me. But then something happened recently. The company’s bank accounts are with Barclays, and they changed the interface or did something so that, when……
-
A great example of a terrible UX (#Barclays)
Every three months my accountant asks me to send them my bank statements to do the company’s VAT returns. It’s annoying but hey, no one can access my bank account except me. But then something happened recently. The company’s bank accounts are with Barclays, and they changed the interface or did something so that, when……
-
The Guardian view on Australia’s social media ban: dragging tech companies into action | Editorial
Children under the age of 16 needed protecting and the moral argument wasn’t winning. Government regulation can change the terms of debate On 10 December, the world watched as Australia enacted the first social media ban for under-16s. Whether it will have the desired effect of improving young people’s lives we are yet to find…
-
The Guardian view on Australia’s social media ban: dragging tech companies into action | Editorial
Children under the age of 16 needed protecting and the moral argument wasn’t winning. Government regulation can change the terms of debate On 10 December, the world watched as Australia enacted the first social media ban for under-16s. Whether it will have the desired effect of improving young people’s lives we are yet to find…
-
The Guardian view on Australia’s social media ban: dragging tech companies into action | Editorial
Children under the age of 16 needed protecting and the moral argument wasn’t winning. Government regulation can change the terms of debate On 10 December, the world watched as Australia enacted the first social media ban for under-16s. Whether it will have the desired effect of improving young people’s lives we are yet to find…
-
The Guardian view on Australia’s social media ban: dragging tech companies into action | Editorial
Children under the age of 16 needed protecting and the moral argument wasn’t winning. Government regulation can change the terms of debate On 10 December, the world watched as Australia enacted the first social media ban for under-16s. Whether it will have the desired effect of improving young people’s lives we are yet to find…
-
The Guardian view on Australia’s social media ban: dragging tech companies into action | Editorial
Children under the age of 16 needed protecting and the moral argument wasn’t winning. Government regulation can change the terms of debate On 10 December, the world watched as Australia enacted the first social media ban for under-16s. Whether it will have the desired effect of improving young people’s lives we are yet to find…
-
The Guardian view on Australia’s social media ban: dragging tech companies into action | Editorial
Children under the age of 16 needed protecting and the moral argument wasn’t winning. Government regulation can change the terms of debate On 10 December, the world watched as Australia enacted the first social media ban for under-16s. Whether it will have the desired effect of improving young people’s lives we are yet to find…